<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atmos GeoProtect vs RAID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/18/atmos-geoprotect-vs-raid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/2010/02/18/atmos-geoprotect-vs-raid/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=atmos-geoprotect-vs-raid</link>
	<description>Storage, Strategy &#38; Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayLucchesi</title>
		<link>http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/2010/02/18/atmos-geoprotect-vs-raid/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>RayLucchesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/?p=1532#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>Anything that protects data takes up additional space. Often the more protection provided, the more space must be devoted to such redundancy.For example, the 10:16 uses the additional 6 instances of data for redundancy purposes. However if each of these were to be considered a drive then this configuration could sustain 6 simultaneous drive failures and still be able to access the data. SImilarly, RAID 1 takes up 2 instances for every instance of data.Redundancy overhead is the price we pay for increased data availability. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that protects data takes up additional space. Often the more protection provided, the more space must be devoted to such redundancy.For example, the 10:16 uses the additional 6 instances of data for redundancy purposes. However if each of these were to be considered a drive then this configuration could sustain 6 simultaneous drive failures and still be able to access the data. SImilarly, RAID 1 takes up 2 instances for every instance of data.Redundancy overhead is the price we pay for increased data availability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/2010/02/18/atmos-geoprotect-vs-raid/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silvertonconsulting.com/blog/?p=1532#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>How do I calculate my Raw or Available space with GeoProtect?   
 
As with any other EMC proprietary software, there is a lot of song and dance when you ask them how much usable space I will have after my Object or file is stored.  It is a wonder that they can sell it in the first place with those types of answers.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I calculate my Raw or Available space with GeoProtect?   </p>
<p>As with any other EMC proprietary software, there is a lot of song and dance when you ask them how much usable space I will have after my Object or file is stored.  It is a wonder that they can sell it in the first place with those types of answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 19/25 queries in 0.239 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.silvertonconsulting.com @ 2012-02-11 13:22:08 -->
